You issued this:
No but I do suppose I was the one blowing the loudest "bullshit trollfud" horn.
Honestly I can't say I blame you. There is a lot of FUD and trolling and false claims that go on here, this just didn't happen to be one of them, as it turns out.
Anyway, the i information is out now, and it will be up to your team to decide how to address it. Ideally it gets fixed.
Signing off from the thread for now unless anyone has a question for me.
Still don't like to overall tone of this criticisms throughout the thread.
But I do have a question for you. I don't have time to sort through all the insults being thrown around by everyone as I'm doing homework.
What exactly does this exploit reveal in a single ring signature transaction? My limited understanding is that reveals which signature belongs to the original initiator of a ring signature. Can any other information be deduced from that signature?