Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] ShadowCash | POSV2 | Untraceable E-Cash | NIZKP | HD+BIP32 | ShadowMarket*
by
sidhujag
on 13/02/2016, 16:51:04 UTC

Great work, Glad that anon was broken so noone will lose money. I suspected it based on the qualify of code that was coming from this team, thus didnt realy expect it to be of commercial quality anyways.. I doubt they will be able to fix it, so id just remove the fteature altogether if i were you.

I suspect based on the number of misspelled words in your post that your ability to judge the quality of code probably isn't too spectacular. Still, you wouldn't be sidhujag if you didn't use this as an opportunity to shill for syscoin (as you have done with the majority of your posts in this thread).

It will be fixed.
You are wrong, you may read the code of sys offers and judge for yourself.. Infact there is a bounty to try to break it or find major bugs.

Then prove me wrong and show me exactly which portions of Shadow's code you think are of poor quality (the part Shen's bug report relates to obviously excluded) and explain how you would improve upon then. Otherwise it just looks like you're here dishonestly casting aspersions on another project in the hope of promoting your own.
Point me out to your unit tests as a starter.. Can you do that?

You made the claim so the burden of proof is on you. I'll be waiting.
Oh i forgot you code is closed source lol.. Again point me out to your unit tests and I will start from there.. No tests? There rests my casse.

the burden is NOT on me because you asked me, now if i dont have access to your code (tests) then i cant really answer your q and my original claim stands..

I guess i should have known you still havent grown up have you? The burden of proof on me just like it was on shen for proving his proof even though you guys refutted it with nonsense fud and 10 hours of testing (did you even do that?).. He had to go ahead and break the anon on the chain to prove it to you, that is very impolite and unprofessional! I guess someone who isnt really an engineer or scholar would never understand.

Thanks thats all i needed to know.. I will update the decentralized market manifesto and remove anon from sdc aswell as update some pertinent information.
It's actually open source which brings us back to what Sativa said about a community growing instead of constantly breaking each others kneecaps. If XMR is capable of debunking anything wouldn't they also be capable of submitting a recommended fix? Or shit even contributing it themselves to the git. Instead of setting up bounties for breaking shit why not setup bounties for fixing shit as a community fund. I'm just spitballing for fun now but dev incentive has always been a worry of mine which would be quelled by a project greenlight type system encompassing all of crypto.
If you werent here constantly bashing others and deleting posts with valid content and concerns then maybe "dev incentive" wouldnt be a problem, heck i even considered you guys valid competitors until i came here and learned how you guys work.. Perhaps you guys are all young and havent been around long enough to understand the business/customer side of things.
I wasn't specifically referring to this project because you are actually replying to devs code and ffmad which have been quite responsive to this. I have been an investor in XST, SSD, SYS, CLOAK, and maaaaaany others which this concept could apply to as well. Even your syscoin UX/UI could benefit from a system of dev incentives. And really the ignorance of the trolls usually experienced causes one to be "onguard". I suppose it was inevitable though that one of the trolls that my metaphorical sword of best intentions met was a legitimate criticism. FUCK ME FOR THAT RIGHT? lols
Hackers love to break and only if you play nice will they offer a fix.. So a bounty to break ismore relevant then hope the hackers wants to offer a fix in hopes that he accepts renumeration for it as incentive.