I have no opinion on the financial matters regarding Vladimir, as I've not been privy to relevant information, but I can confirm that the transfer of ownership was done in a misleading way and one which I consider to be either dishonest, or severely lacking in communication at best.
As an *extremely* minor shareholder due to some work on Issue 1, my signature was obtained to approve asset sales *but* - this was in the context of the recent written resolution which stated that they would be raising capital "for further development and production of our core product Bitcoin Magazine"
Really - my financial interest in the matter is so trivial as to be irrelevant.. frankly, I don't know if it's pennies or pounds.
The point is - it appears to me that the 'asset stripping' of bittalk media was done in a way that was possibly negligent if not outright fraudulent.
Please sign in to your Skype account and read the chat history before making such statements. Several solutions were discussed and the one that was chosen was approved by the majority of the shareholders.
Unfortunately, I'm unable to at the moment.
I understand you may have been using Skype as the main communication medium - but I guess our expectations differ a little in that regard as I expected communications on major issues like that via email (as the June written resolution was) - or I at least expected the document giving asset selling authority to give more specific notice of it's actual nature.
I'm sorry if my message above was a bit accusational - the truth is I don't know what went on, and the announcement came as a surprise to me.
To temper my statement above - well perhaps I should have been more proactive in seeking out information at the time.
My reaction stems from surprise, and I thought the purpose of written resolutions etc was to avoid just such surprises.