And why don't you go read about how dumb Szabo is about the smart contract issue:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.msg13870882#msg13870882There is the video of him not understanding the externalities issue and Turing completeness (see above link).
And then add this:
Im not a fan of the term smart contracts. For a start, it has been used by so many people for so many different things, that we should probably just ban it completely. For example, the first known reference is from 1997, when Nick Szabo used it to describe physical objects that change their behavior based on some data. More recently, the term has been used for the exact opposite: to describe computation on a blockchain which is influenced by external events such as the weather. For now lets put both of these meanings aside.
I want to focus here on smart contracts in the sense of general purpose computation that takes place on a blockchain. This meaning was popularized by Ethereum, whose white paper is subtitled A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform.
And yet you claim Szabo is Satoshi. You guys are a like a dog, you will hump any tree stump.
How about getting in touch with reality.
Woohoo look at you, you're so smart, yet all you do is whine around the forum thinking how dumb everybody is and how we're all beneath you. Yet that's all you do, whine and baghold your mined shit coins. Haha