isnt that an abuse?
It takes a lot more time and effort than a forum discussion to accuse/prove anyone and i don't think that would be appropriate for the victims of the scam.The judgmental decisions might save the future victims and also the time.
I could post addresses of all the level1 players but that wont make me an alt of them ? or will that make all the DT1 alt's of one person ? Even the blockchain proof is not completely solid because of shared wallets and stuff.
It requires a lot of funds and a professional team of detectives with more then better skills in crypto and bitcoin.But because you are not tied in a cell you might attempt more and more scams ,therefore there is a protocol or a boilerplate to NEG TAG people and it might go wrong sometimes.But that doesn't means you should ignore the positiviy behind it.
show me one person who lost money with me
Stop acting QS.I can assure you that if you buy a GREEN account and enroll it in SIG just to get some higher rates then no one will NEG TAG you but a neutral and on the other hand if you buy the same account and start offering services like
xetsr says,then do you seriously want me to explain what is shady here ?
fake feedback and then start trading. This is shady enough for me to leave negative feedback and I'm sure others will agree.
Do you mean mean SELF TRADING and giving feedback's to alt's while being on DT with the other one ? OH YES !! that is shady enough and others will agree with that too.