Actually, Trump, right along with all the other candidates, is a detriment to society. The only possible candidate that might have done anything good was Paul, when he was running. Why? Because none of the candidates except Paul have any thoughts about shutting down the taxation system, and the Federal Reserve Bank.
Taxation is legalized robbery. Robbery that is legalized is still robbery. This means that it is unlawful, even though it is legal.
If people want government to do something, they should be able to donate, and get a receipt that shows where their money went. It shouldn't be stolen from them to be used for things that they don't want done.
IN OTHER WORDS, as long as there is a taxation system, the rest of it doesn't matter. Political BS is all BS. Taxation rules no matter who wins. If there was a President who dissolved the Federal Reserve, and got rid of taxation while replacing it with a donation system, only then might the position of Presidency be useful.
Taxation is legalized robbery. Robbery that is legalized is still robbery. This means that it is unlawful, even though it is legal.
If people want government to do something, they should be able to donate, and get a receipt that shows where their money went. It shouldn't be stolen from them to be used for things that they don't want done.
IN OTHER WORDS, as long as there is a taxation system, the rest of it doesn't matter. Political BS is all BS. Taxation rules no matter who wins. If there was a President who dissolved the Federal Reserve, and got rid of taxation while replacing it with a donation system, only then might the position of Presidency be useful.
No tax... So you have no country right? Because without tax you have no election, no government, no military, no police, no schools, no hospitals... Nothing.
That is the way the system works now, taxation, I mean. If it were all donation, it would work just as well. Why? Because people donate to their favorite cause all the time.
The major difference in a donation system would be that we would have wiser people in government. Why? Because the wealthy are smart enough to determine who is wise. They would donate to people who had wise causes. And being wealthy, they could donate more.
If the poor were that smart, they would determine how to not be so poor. Since they are poor, it is evident that they are not so smart, because they are still poor. Yet they get their say in determining which candidate gets elected. That's why we often get foolish people elected to government. And it all revolves around taxation rather than donation.
Oh my god you're really an American...
So being wealthy means being smart and wise??
So reasons why the children of rich people are most of the time always rich too is because they're wise? Not because they've been helped by their parents?
This is really incredible I wouldn't have thought people like you exists...
I suppose then you're incredibly rich? Or you're stupid?