Re: [ANN] [DRZ-V3] [DROIDZ-V3] [ANTI-INSTAMINE] - A FRESH NEW START - WALLET 3.0.1
Thank you, chrysophylax. I misread OP as 2.5m coins total and thought there is fraud.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good blackcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar bucks, diff=15, codehash=1614ae5d2c3ad8f7dc5f; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good blackcoin
AcceptToMemoryPool Good bucks
SendMessages Good bucks
CheckProofOfWork Good dash blackcoin
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar bucks, diff=18, codehash=a462278b5c7e9a9ffd24; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar midnight, diff=23, codehash=1f4f42698dec70cd6bb2; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=e81ce550d5d18dd509af; Manually inspected, Good
GetTransaction Most similar blackcoin arch, diff=20, codehash=7858e158e4599c2ec9a8; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=15, codehash=96ffb7293de292b70f9f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
GetProofOfStakeLimit Most similar arch, diff=2, codehash=9350f436ca727852abcb; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Most similar bucks, diff=14, codehash=2cfb213b75b47886caec; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar bucks, diff=2, codehash=05095919e7df629fba28; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good blackcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good blackcoin
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good blackcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar bucks, diff=11, codehash=5b33ca3968c6d9b60ae8; Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['ComputeMinStake', 'ComputeMinWork']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good 5,500,000 coins in first block
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good 2,500,000 coins in 23820 block
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good blackcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar bucks, diff=15, codehash=1614ae5d2c3ad8f7dc5f; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good blackcoin
AcceptToMemoryPool Good bucks
SendMessages Good bucks
CheckProofOfWork Good dash blackcoin
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar bucks, diff=18, codehash=a462278b5c7e9a9ffd24; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar midnight, diff=23, codehash=1f4f42698dec70cd6bb2; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=e81ce550d5d18dd509af; Manually inspected, Good
GetTransaction Most similar blackcoin arch, diff=20, codehash=7858e158e4599c2ec9a8; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=15, codehash=96ffb7293de292b70f9f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
GetProofOfStakeLimit Most similar arch, diff=2, codehash=9350f436ca727852abcb; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Most similar bucks, diff=14, codehash=2cfb213b75b47886caec; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar bucks, diff=2, codehash=05095919e7df629fba28; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good blackcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good blackcoin
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good blackcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar bucks, diff=11, codehash=5b33ca3968c6d9b60ae8; Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['ComputeMinStake', 'ComputeMinWork']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good 5,500,000 coins in first block
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good 2,500,000 coins in 23820 block
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
all good ...
and welcome
...if you read back on the history of the coin - and the history from the start - you will see a rocky road at the best of times ...
the original developer was a greedy charleton that was a 'serial coiner' who ripped a LOT of the communities off of btc from his scammy ico / ipo with fancy graphics and swindling persona ... this is NOT the only coin he has created and NOT the only community he has ripped senseless ... he still has a foray once in a while in the thread - and i believe its because he is truly upset about the fact that he couldnt kill the coin ...
a resilient bunch the droidz community are
...next came the dev that tried to resurrect the coin - but was too busy with so many other things that he didnt finish the job ... after that was a good dev that coded well and was loyal to the progression of droidz - but trusted the wrong person with passwords and wallets ...
hence the reason we were called in recently and i asked soopy to come in to have a look and see if he was interested in working on the project as the core dev ... he obviously was
...many members have helped with the growth and stability of the coin - and the community as a whole has been positive about the outcome ... and so far - i hope we have all delivered ...
but i can tell you this much - none of this would hve happened was it not for greedyjohn and his persistence in bringing together people to make this what it is ... not many people know what goes on in the background unless you are directly involved - and greedyjohn has been involved with this from the very beginning ... we ALL work and do what we can - and this is proving to be the beginnings of a good path we are taking ...
the devs that have actually helped so far - have all contributed - as have quite a few of the community members ... this is just the beginning ...
the work that needs to be done will prove to be a lot ... so i hope that we can all get it together in a positive way - and ignore ( yes there is an ignore button ) those that continue to try and belittle and regress the progress that is made ... step by step - we will get there ...
the swap from old to new drz is going to take place - and in the hands of a good core coder like soopy - it will happen smoothly ...
the code has been redone and recoded a few times now - so your search through the code is always welcome ...
as a team - we have no intention of duplicating the same issues we have had in the past - leaving the community lost and out of pocket ... so we do what we can to make sure that not only the code is as best as we can make it - but also the infrastructure and framework that its based on ...
so njoi ...
and im off to bed now ...
...#crysx