I regard anyone who would presume to decide for others what is moral and immoral as a theologian.
Did you mean to say "philosopher" or are you saying there can be no morality without religion?
Yes to no objective morality without religion.
.
I would not like to have a word with him. He is a piece of shit. Dostoyevsky would like to have a word with you.
If you reject a philosophy simply because it disagrees with your beliefs, and not based on its merits, How does that make you better than a theologian?
I don't think it has any merits other than those accorded to it by my feelings. I don't see how it could.
I recognize and accept that your feelings about morality may differ. That makes me better than a theologian.