The original post for this thread indicates that a guess of +1.0 would go through +1.19%, and not the previous 1.09%. That suggests intervals of .2 rather than .1. Is that a typo, or a deliberate change in the plan?
typo it is and corrected
The original post for this thread indicates that a guess of +1.0 would go through +1.19%, and not the previous 1.09%. That suggests intervals of .2 rather than .1. Is that a typo, or a deliberate change in the plan?
Also noticed it, must be a typo.
fixed it
probably just a fight between 2 foreign laborers.. i doubt they were arguing about the bits and who gets them.
i like Elwar's comment on the article.. pretty accurate "I'm seeing a trend now. Headline says "blockchain" when it is good news, "Bitcoin" when it is bad news."
on another note. would it be so hard to post a link to the new thread before locking the previous one?
i must not know how to use the forum properly but it took me a bunch of clicks to find this new one.
link has been added