Whatever you may think about this thread or the people involved: It's a fact that you'll find more helpful infos here than anywhere else. And that's easy to prove because if you would read this thread and just focus on the informations you'll see that the Neucoin-desaster was predicted, underlined with arguments. And sure, not all posts are informative but under the line this thread has more value than Neucoin and I'm serious about that. Reason: It helped to safe money while Neucoin ripped those who believed in it.
And if you say now:
"I'm not the shill you take me for and recognize that there are clearly problems, even if I still think there is a possibility that they could reach new people who aren't into crypto so hold onto a few coins because of that."
I don't understand that logic, because I can't see anything good in it if there should be more unexperienced ppl who invest in this.
Can you understand the logic of your own statement - you are saying here that as long as there is any possibility that anybody might take an interest in Neucoin you will keep up your campaign to convince them otherwise. You are not here to be unbiased or present facts, you are clearly on a personal attack mission.
I'm not sure what's your definition of "facts" but I would say: Something is a fact if it turns out to be true. And I don't say I'm unbiased and I don't say all of my posts are full of facts. But you won't find many posts without facts or at least informations or argumentation. And it turned out to be true.
Two questions:
1. Why not attack a project that is not legit? Or do you believe it's legit and if yes, why?
2. Do you believe that there is anybody who bought into the ICO and would not wish he would have read this thread instead of investing in NEU?