@all

currently one user I do ignore and for two reasons: a) the user keeps rude and making things personal, despite no particular reason and after repeated requests to stop that; b) the user made a claim and failed to backup his utterances with facts that are verifiable for the readers of the forum (such a user might still hold his claim for true, but cannot expect us to accept his rather bold accusations because he wants to believe them. We specifically asked for hard data, so we could take measures).

I suggest for this user to make a new alias and give it another try, or - better - apologize, backup his claim and contribute to this thread in a way that benefits those interested in LEOcoin.

Again, also critical questions are welcome, I see however no need to answer all kind of questions and often I simply cannot because it is not public information (yet) or concerning third parties and their behaviour and choices - for which LEOcoin Foundation cannot speak.

I also wish to point at the tangled situation with the suspected bot mining and the herewith connected suggested change to a sole POS mechanism. This thread is relevant, as it is a place where opions and questions can be shared. LEOcoin Foundation shares this with members of LEOcoin development team, members of LEO Ltd. management and other third parties who are involved with LEOcoin. Depending on their reactions, I can pass new information on. Currently there are a lot of important issues going on and the process of decisionmaking needs time.

LEOcoin Foundation is having access to many sources and thus is more knowledgeable sometimes and we respect your need for information and updates, but cannot simply make statements or answer questions regarding issues that are not yet clear or decided, as we strive for our messages to be backed up by facts (like verifiable utterances in an interview) and probable courses of action. Where we look into the future of LEOcoin, we can only share intentions, plans and hopes and the various ways to get there.

What is encouraging in a way, is that despite the sharp drop in price, the level is still enough to keep LEOcoin grossly into the top 25 of the CC world (place 17 at the moment) and that volumes are already drying up whereas the total Hashpower is declining. For those mining, this will mean that with a lower difficulty they get more LEOcoins, for others it will simply mean that miners gave up on LEOcoin. As always, it depends on your point of view. For one a person is a freedom fighter, for another a terrorist. For one the user I ignore seems plausible, others would rather have that user gone too. We can dream can't we? After all, we are in digital currency land ....