Do i really need to go back thru my post history to find how many months ago i started barking about this.. ITS BEEN Far too long ago now.. Esp the size of the miner in question. Should have been more obvious to someone that is a great pool op or so caring of the miners like you say! guess ill check my first fb post and on here about this exact problem. Only to come to find out after 4 months i was right.. Seriously man defending slush makes you look the fool..
ANd again .. .slush says this was a bad firmware in miners.. NOt a pool proxy.. so lets come with the info on the miners already..ill walk away once that info is out
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg13158361#msg13158361https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg13166550#msg13166550 this shows you i once supported slush.. but his handling of this issue is horrible in my eyes! i think what pissed me off the most was his dead silence and total disregard for the issue... just kept telling me its luck move along.. F$%% that.. good thing i didnt! Or i should say good for you Pekatete since you still mine here!!
Best regards
d57heinz
Whether you spotted the issue that long ago is neither here nor there, fact is (and as far as I am concerned) it has now been resolved. For what it is worth, I'll add that I will take slush's word over yours any day wihout batting an eyelid, and that is not a reflection on you.
By the way, I am NOT defending slush, just pointing out the facts as I see them, if anything, just to stem your tirade of twaddle (though clearly it is not working on that last one!).