I was not actually trying to apply their ToS to the sites, but showing a comparison of how the sites and cryptocoins are not just the same as WoW/SecondLife.
You had stated:
"but anything that can be said about WoW/SecondLife can be said about cryptocoin."
There are fundamental differences between them. That is all.

I gotcha. So what you're saying is that the fundamental difference lies in the original intent of the programmers that created the virtual goods? Is that accurate?
As long as you know how you will present the package in court (and hopefully this never happens, to anyone.), and feel comfortable with it that is all that matters in the end.

As I stated before, I am just tossing out concerns from my personal opinion, as well as providing another point of view that might hopefully be of some help, and are not meant to be considered an argument to fight instead.
As always, I wish you, and your partners the best of luck.

I wouldn't say I find anything about this comfortable in court. For the reasons described earlier. You never know what a judge is going to do. What is your take with BitFunder? Is BitFunder registered with your state's corporate division? (I see you have (C) BitFunder on the site, inferring BitFunder is a registered entity?) And it's hosted and operated in the US?
I really appreciate your input, it's good to discuss this stuff.
Cheers.