Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Attached Transactions - Alternative to Replace By Fee (RBF) - Anti Censorship
by
kayrice
on 21/02/2016, 22:43:13 UTC
> Choosing to publish zero transactions is not rational behaviour

Currently happens multiple times per day. Check the blockchain an empty block is published every once in a while (Although they do this because they have poor internet)

> because a miner doing so loses out on collected fees to the next miner, the same is true of cherry picking individual transactions; even if one miner does this, the next guy has no reason to do so.

Except the cost is low. My $0.04 tx fee as a single user cannot compete with various interests of censorship. However, if my $0.04 was pooled together with other users who didnt want me to be censored it would balloon into a larger amount that would be very hard to convince all miners not to process.