That the MAJORITY of investors who wanted to continue didn't agree on an exchange isn't the same as counting a bunch of them as voting to close.
Strike one.
And that's aside from fact that votes was tallied based on number of people voting - not number of shares.
Strike two. Especially considering plenty of people probably voted with 0 shares.
And having failed at basic commonsense and math he then immediately closed and sent back funds without waiting to see if anyone noticed the rather interesting voting process used.
Strike three.
This is not just an instance of scummy sometime in the distant past. This is scummy in continued form.
And shockingly none of the investors appear to even have noticed that there wasn't a majority in favour of closure.
People of GLBSE.