The existence of Santa Clause can be disproven, but the existence of God can only be speculated.
I'd love to see this proof... considering it's impossible
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence#Proving_a_negativeIn 1992 during a presentation at Caltech, skeptic James Randi said "you can't prove a negative". He claims that he cannot prove a negative (such as that telepathy does not exist), but he argues that an individual who claims telepathy exists must prove it...
Santa was created by the Coca-Cola company
Santa is 300+ years older than the Coca-Cola company
You're right, I retract my statement. Santa Clause still does have an origin and story based off people who existed in time,
my point is still valid.
You said you could
DISPROVE Santa
He's dead, I win.
So is God, I win
How can you say this when you can't prove he ever existed?
Didn't your God died on the cross?
No, that would be God's begotten Son. Don't get it twisted.
Who is one with his Father. Son/Father/And Holy spirit, you forgot the mantra. They all died on the cross.
You misunderstand: God created the angels, Jesus was one of them, he sent Jesus to Earth, we crucified him.
What Christian denomination are you?
Jesus was God's son and God himself. Holy trinity (son+father+holy spirit) that is what Roman Catholics thought me.
So according to their twisted logic, the whole trinity died on the cross. Like three Musketeers. One for all, all for one.
You misunderstand: God created the angels, Jesus was one of them, he sent Jesus to Earth, we crucified him.
You misunderstand your own dogma
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrinityThe Christian doctrine of the Trinity defines God as three consubstantial persons, expressions, or hypostases: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit; "one God in three persons". The three persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature".
By that same article: "According to this central mystery of some Christian faiths," which means, some, not all.
Name a denomination that does not believe in the Trinity
I have no denomination, but I believe in righteousness and
have a strong moral code. What you folks are doing is purely hateful, calling out others for the sake of attacking them and their beliefs.
I'm ashamed to share this forum with you.
Good for you. So do I.
You might have a strong moral code, but that code is not from the Bible. It is based on what you as a person believe is producing least suffering. That is what most normal people use as basis for their moral code. There are of course cultural influences as well.
Again nothing to do with a bronze age story book. At least I hope you are not getting moral code from it.
We are not hateful, we are just pointing out the obvious nonsense.
You can't sit there and assume you know my upbringing. I've come to learn my moral code is pretty damn close to the bible, and whether or not that's true is irrelevant. What you are doing
is hateful, like calling someone "nonsense". That's an attack. You're a shit-disturber, nothing more.
Edit: RE: your edit
"PS. I suspect you did not actually read the whole Bible. I suggest you do. By the time you get to the end, you'll be an Atheist. "
By your own admission, you haven't either, so I suggest you shut the fuck up.