The dealer did not Blackjack also.
The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.
I know. The second part is just a mistake I found.
Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push
Player BJ + Dealer 21 = Player Win
We know this, they don't.
Everyone know about that basic rules. I think it's more likely to technical fault which it's accidentally or we can say it's a bug? Mistaken algorithm.
Never happened to me the case like this btw, i just wish fj could clarify and solve this problem asap .
This was the case with the player: Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push. We checked the hand ID provided and gave the answer.
You are mixing withe the previous hand when you had 8 and 6 and the dealer had 6, 7 and 8.
I am not mixing anything up.
Provide proof.
I want the hash, screenshots, everything.
Stop wasting time and provide the evidence.
Since your check bet does not work, and it provides a player nothing but a 'bet number' you can fabricate any evidence you want. There is NO transparency here.
Your system cannot be trusted.
I know for a fact the dealer did not have a Blackjack, that's the whole reason I'm pissed off. The system cheats and you're just trying to cover it up.
I had Blackjack and the dealer had 6,7,8 , which is the 3 card 21.
You've basically clarified the fact that I stated the dealer did have a 3 card 21, just you're lying about the rest!