1. I agree, this type of coordinated trust abuses is bad for the community as a whole, one guy said jump and the others said how hign, if you ask them for evidence that the cards arent legit they cant give you an nswer but they think its fine to leave negative rep without having any evidence to defend their arguments
2. I dont know who gave them the authority but i will be contacting the persons that have these users on their trust list,
1) Well then, you probably haven't followed the discussion. If one has been given an unfair neg, they are free to prove otherwise(that they have got their GCs from a legitimate source) and the neg will be removed. Its not like a neg once given destroys one's reputation, KWH once gave me a neg just to prove a point and now he has me under his trust list(which he once explicitly excluded me from)
Also, it doesn't go "Innocent until proven guilty" , just think of the scammers going bonkers with offering deals with a payment method , going for hugely (very attractive) less than market rate(lets say 20% for example). Now I don't see how one can prove him guilty if the individual just ignores the concerns over the proof of the amount claimed
2) Please don't. If you're talking about me and Lutpin, we are under Blazed's list and he is already near to being pissed off with the number of PMs he gets asking for us to be removed. Also fun fact, you have me under your trust list. If you feel my ratings aren't accurate , feel free to exclude me using "~" before my name