I am fairly certain that I know who the OP is and I don't think it is productive to make ad hominem attacks against the OP, as I would argue that he is probably one of the most trusted people around.
I would say that I agree that Mexxer-2 and Lutpin are strange choices for being in the Default Trust network. I would also say there is a high chance they are the same person.
I somewhat get the feeling that some people are trying to make a name for themselves as being a scam buster. They are doing this by stretching the definition of a scammer and leaving negative trust for people who probably do not have the drive nor motivation to defend their name/reputation, even though what they are accused of doing, even if true, is really not scamming.
I would note that a good number of the "Mexxer-2 and Lutpin" threads have resulted in no additional negative ratings being added to the accounts of those complaining, and in a decent number of instances the ratings have been removed. On the other hand, it was fairly rare that a rating that I left was inappropriate, and as a result very few ratings needed to be removed that I left and many of the "QS" threads resulted in additional people looking at the evidence and leaving additional ratings on those complaining.
I agree 100%, if you make your ratings without anything solid behind them, you will find yourself removing them ever so often, In a few days we will see him and luptin removing another one of their feedback from anonymous22's page, he already sent his method to someone trusted for review
I don't know why Blazed added them though, they were good as Spam busters and just that, but now they are focusing their efforts at scam busting which is clearly not their field, I don't know why Blazed considers Spam busters to be good scam busters
I also agree on the point that they (the hateleague) are just trying to make a name for themselves, I also agree that since lately some of their ratings need review, blazed probably needs to manually review these ratings