Hmm, couldn't all the pools just go with 2MB and tell the devs who think they control everything to stop trying to make themselves feel important?
Bitcoin is by design controlled by the consensus of the miners, not by centralised control.
It would seem that there are all sorts of parties trying to control bitcoin and I guess they all simply fail to understand the design.
Doesn't really matter how important devs think they are, if they want to be a relevant part of the blockchain decisions then they need to be miners.
...
BlockStream/Sidechains/SegWit all sounds a lot like trying pointlessly to control altcoins and make something like a partial SPV ... to me.
Moments of Lucidity are Lucid.
kano's a legend
Dude was elbow deep looong before any of these 2013 bubble joiners read their first article. Before Adam Back realized his "hashcash extended with inflation control" might just be a thing.
As the discussion has been split, and moved, here's the link to his actual comment:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377560.msg14005202#msg14005202