whos job is it to proof my thoughts are wrong?
Your Own cause you are the accuser.
nope. i dont have to proof what i think or belive. also again for you what the neg option states:
Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.
It doesnt say something about having evidence. In most of the cases we present one by leaving a correct reference. Just because i think someone is a scammer doesnt make him one, thats why most of the people -veing take their feedbacks back when proven wrong. I know it should be the other way around BUT no one dies, no one goes to jail because he has a feedback.
Lets do it the other way around and lets stick with GCs. What evidence would you like to see if we say: "Those GCs are not legit"?