That's because you keep making strange-ass assumptions. If you focus on what I'm saying, and not what you think I'm saying - or would like me to be saying - you should do better. Now, what was it about my non-warfare-persistence examples list response to your argument that you actually take issue with?
I remember I said something similar to you some time ago. How does it feel to taste your own medicine?
No answer? Can I assume you accept that the military do, on occasion, design things where warfare-persistence is not a design goal. Or would you like to try another desperate roll of the dice?