Yes, indeed I do. I have statements from people involved in ARPANET at the time that list ARPANET's design goals, and, to date, no one has shown those statements to be false.
I'm sorry to inform you but that is not evidence. It's at most a theory, but to be more just, I'd call it a speculation.
As a theory it would be falsifiable, no? So you should (a) be able to disprove it, and (b) provide evidence supporting your theory.
"Besides, the Internet was designed to persist during war. "If this statement of yours is correct, then you should be able to provide evidence supporting it, and you should be able to provide evidence disproving Charles Herzfeld's claim that "the ARPAnet came out of our frustration that there were only a limited number of large, powerful research computers in the country, and that many research investigators who should have access to them were geographically separated from them."
Do you have any evidence to support your claim?Do you have any evidence that disproves Charles Herzfeld's claim?(Just two yes/no questions. That shouldn't tire you out too much).
I'm still assuming your answer is "no", do please shout if you've come up with some new challenge to rational thought.