Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Did Blockstream veto the roundtable consensus?
by
adamstgBit
on 27/02/2016, 17:22:10 UTC
Does Core intend to go ahead with the proposal reached at the roundtable consensus? (segwit ASAP + 2MB HF a year later)

From the consensus letter

Quote
The Bitcoin Core contributors present at the Bitcoin Roundtable will have an implementation of such a hard-fork available as a recommendation to Bitcoin Core within three months after the release of SegWit

It is possible for Bitcoin Core to reject the HF recommendation.

Quote
This hard-fork is ... will only be adopted with broad support across the entire Bitcoin community

So, I read this as saying that nothing is set in stone yet, i.e. a HF is not guaranteed to happen.

i understand it's not guaranteed, i would however like some kind of statement that Core devs at least wants to go ahead with 2MB limit.
if i go by what i'm hearing its almost guaranteed that they will simply say "decentralization", "dangerous HF" and then call it off THEMSELVES.
are they genuinely backing the 2MB proposal? or did they simply agree to shoot it down again next year?
this is more of a rant than anything else... not worth responding to:
Vladimir said "I'm all for it" thats a start, but  Vladimir is another one of these leaders with no balls like Adam of blockstream, at least that what it SEEMS like. If you can't speak on behalf of your team and or make the tough calls when your team members can't agree your not a leader.