yet the blockstream fanboys at r/bitcoin do the exact same thing for anything not blockstream. defending blockstream blindly, never even questioning who they are defending. yet many people that just want 2mb blocks will admit that hearne and gavins implementations wont work. for the simple reason that adam back has veto power of core and a larger budget to keep control of bitcoin.
so everyone is basically pleading to adam back to allow 2mb

basically anything that goes against blockstreams roadmap. no matter who made it. will get abused, insulted and ultimately ignored.
maybe worth questioning your own faith of who you honour and protect before saying others who dont blindly trust corporations must be on drugs.

bitcoin is suppose to be open, without corporation backing or control. a true monetary freedom system for anyone to be involved in(but not control of).
so goodluck saying that is true still

if your not willing to investigate who is entrusted with the code that secures your funds. then you might aswell think of bitcoin-core as MTGOX 2011, blindly trusting their secure code and thinking they will never do you wrong. because that was the mindset of people using mtgox in 2011.

its far better to check and learn about who is protecting your funds, rather then blindly trust their honour and motives and cry later, should something happen