Any proof of existence of anything relies on prior assumptions, the seeming least of all is that we exist such that we can observe.
There is no definitive proof of anything that is not reliant on our subjective reality.
Scientific objectivity relies on this too, it cannot exist without our subjective acceptance. Any claims that reality exists independent of us is unprovable.
There is no definitive proof of anything that is not reliant on our subjective reality.
Scientific objectivity relies on this too, it cannot exist without our subjective acceptance. Any claims that reality exists independent of us is unprovable.
Yeah and what? We don't ask for absolute proof of God, of course it's impossible to get. We ask for a logical proof based on logical assumptions...
Except that cause and effect are upheld by Newton's 3rd Law. And this means that everything is pre-programmed to exist the way it does. And since the laws of entropy show us that everything is dispersing and diffusing, this means that complexity is diminishing. All of this means that whoever programmed the universe into being by cause and effect, is way more intelligent than people are... way more intelligent beyond understanding. This Intelligence (Which, obviously, is at least somewhat alien to us) fits our dictionary definitions of "God."
Science and logic prove that God exists, even if you don't like it.
