1.Considering the Trust system,all signature campaigns should completely remove "Trust" as one of their rules for users to participate in them.

2.Initially it was meant to spot out scammers who literally have ripped people off for dollars  who don't deserve to be here but since then a lot has changed.

3.I see people with highest quality of posts with negative feebacks for silly reasons.I think investing in a Ponzi is a subject limited to one's personal choices ,you can't force him to not to.That being said, if you don't comply with his intentions,you're free to leave him a feedback and this should be understood by the campaign managers that it necessarily doesn't portray one is a spammer and he deserves to be kicked out of campaign if he still has the highest quality of posts .

4.Just my two cents.You don't exactly have to agree with it.