No, I was simply telling you about locks because you are misinformed about them and seem to be suffering from the delusion that a lock is there to keep dishonest people out. They are not and never have been, they are to keep honest people honest, nothing more.
Inaba, beyond your horrible job as PR, you are also an funny douche...
You initial premise is complete fallacious. Tell me, if locks are there to keep honest people honest, what happens when locks are not there? Dishonest people are keep dishonest?
Do you realize how absurd is your premise? Let's try again: 'Doors are there to keep honest people honest'.
Should people buy more doors to keep more honest people honest?
See if you can spot the logical fallacies in your argument.
Protip: There's 3 of them
After you're done, come back and we might be able to have a debate. As it is, you're just blathering without making any sense.
Oh my god this is rich, Inaba - the twit that cannot grasp the simple concept of burden of proof is lecturing others on 'logical fallacies'.
I think you have reached the 'Eric Cartman' level of delusions Inaba, its time for you to go fuck some gay fish buddy.