Re: Someone give you negative trust for participating in a PONZI?
Just to prove the issue with the way things are going...
Can you prove you where not involved? Are the accusations only going to be extended to certain people
Just a joke but you can see that the logic is faulty if they do not neg rep you without you providing evidence.
Can you prove you where not involved? Are the accusations only going to be extended to certain people
Just a joke but you can see that the logic is faulty if they do not neg rep you without you providing evidence.
I think it's quite different.
I made it known that I had played at what I believed to be good dice sites. When I became suspicious that things were wrong, I posted about that too.
That's quite different from posting positive reports about ponzi schemes. Everyone knows the ponzi scheme is a scam and that it will eventually stop paying out, and so it is bad form to make positive posts about it, knowing full well that it is a scam.
And if anyone doesn't know, it should be said that Quickseller has been trolling dooglus on this forum by repeating his lies again and again whenever he can. It's his style. Once QS decides to hate you, he will concoct any convoluted stories he can and repeat them again and again (often using many different accounts) in order to try to damage your reputation. He used to be so successful at this that people were actually promoting him to default trust and even trusting him with increasingly large amounts of money. Thankfully, QS' tactics and trustworthiness were revealed when he basically had a public meltdown on the last 10 or so pages of this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171059.0
I'm just saying this here and now because it's important to call him out when he does this. Every time one of the people he's attacking says something anywhere, he'll do his best to twist it into an attack onto that person's reputation. dooglus should be able to offer an opinion on this thread without QS repeating his lies about dooglus, but since he gets away with that, I feel the need to draw attention to the fact that it's a baseless ad hominem by a guy who spends waaay too much time repeating lies on this forum.