That is not how fee markets work , there are upper limits to how much spammers andsome users will spend on fees.
FTFY. Especially given the recently published definition of spam as 'transaction accompanied by fee lower than typically included in recent blocks'.
That's a nice definition. It reminds me of an article in The Economist some 20 years ago where they showed how the soviet apparatchiks used definitions to make their data say what they wanted it to say.
No users are affected, some are just redefined as spammers.