Removed users:
Unsubstantial posts:
...
I have randomly opened a few of those blacklisted users to see their posts and, at least for those i've looked, they did not look unsubstantial for me.
OFC there are posts and replies; i would like to sugest implementing a minimum word count for a post to be paid. That can be automated.
Now i'm scared of replying when my answer is simple enought and can be considered a 'poor' post.
You're wrong. They are removed not because of the one liner post but if you could look through their post history, all posts seems to have the same thougt in it they were luke the same sentences but only rephrased and were posted in different threads. Most of these people were posting only on a certain thread instead of poating in multiple threads. Also I believe that the meaning of substantial post is that
your post actually make sense. You will notice tha easily. There is a difference from a simple answer and an answer made just to spam.
I checked some of the links and i agree with your comment. I think if one is spending time just to learn more and share experiences with other users, there won`t be an issue. It is best just to forget about signature campaign and spend quality time. Hovewer i have to admit that it does worry me a bit if i have to give a short answer to someone in order to make something clear.
I am very happy with Yobit signature campaign so far and i can recommend to everyone who is going to make honest contribute on this forum.
I would like to suggest to campaign that before ban users send a warning to user about posts quality. Tell him what isn't right with his posts and give him one more chance. I saw some posts too, and it wasn't unsubstantial, short answers, but made sense in the thread. If Yobit isn't satisfied with my posts
for an example i would like to know why before be banned.
It's just a suggestion. I'm happy with this signature campaign service and i have only positive feedbacks about it. But after that big banned list, i'm a bit afraid...