Forgot to add I do think it is unfair for users to be given negative trust for participating in a Ponzi thread - a neutral would be better - as the punishment 
for participating and for actually carrying out the Ponzi scam are the same.
You were promoting the ponzi directly in your Personal text, and posting outside the Investors based games. Which is why the neg for participating and for actually carrying out the Ponzi scam are the same.Also, good thing you finally are managing your trust list but others can still see the neg from DT as trusted, as most users have DT in their trust ist by default
I was posting the faucet aspect which while it was running was very good - 0.0006BTC a day. As soon as the site died and the admin ran off I removed the personal text. I never advised people to upgrade and put their own money in and in the thread itself only gave honest feedback on my experience at the time and when it went tits up posted that too.
I know others can see the negative feedback, but I can't so it doesn't bother me.
Cryptodick is still ignored, because he is not worth the effort responding to.