Reserved if needed.
(I didn't leak or abuse any information at all from Blockchain, please read the other thread.)
You didn't leak any of it, but you have access to a TON of information about account holders and their accounts, and you were prepared to leverage this information to resolve a customer service dispute in a completely unrelated business. I call that abusing it.
you cant be serious. I personally wish everyone would always post all information publicly about any and all fraud/dishonesty. It would help to lessen the need for the use of violence in resolving disputes.
I agree, which is why I have posted about the violation of blockchain.info's privacy policy. This does fall under a reasonable definition of dishonesty, right?
EDIT: blockchain.info has acted in a responsible way and removed from MemoryDealers all future access to personal information. They could not know in advance that MemoryDealers would abuse the access allowed them as an employee. As such this post has been edited to make it clear that blockchain.info is not responsible for the actions of this particular ex-employee.