There's a slight difference between someone offering transport and someone offering violence. It's very difficult to control violence without a monopoly.
Right, so because YOU can't possibly fathom how something would work without a monopoly that means that violently imposing taxes over the people in a certain geographical area is the only possibility?
Again, Socialists always know what's right for everyone!
In essence all that I am asking is that you respect my right to opt out of paying into YOUR system. You might find it great. Maybe I don't and I'd rather be left the fuck alone to buy security or healthcare. What is so hard difficult about that, besides the fact that you desire to control people? The whole goddamn argument comes down to voluntary and involuntary relationships. The state that only allows one option and no freedom to opt out is no better than the slave master who claims what he's doing is virtuous because his slaves are allowed to walk around his fenced in 5 acre property. No freedom to leave!