This is an interesting symptom that I notice within all communities on this board where upon there was very poor initial distribution (within the crypto community - i.e bct)
This is an interesting symptom: latecomers cry that they are late, that did not manage to get all the closing doors of this world.
Where were you while the month of distribution?
No need to compare projects within a month there will be the same as you, to be crying in Lisk, that they were too late and it is bad and wrong, that this is so. For such need not be only second ICO, but third, fourth, fifth ICO and till indefinitely.
But you've not answered why you don't want a second ICO?
Do you not want more funds for your project? such a small ICO ?
You could have an ICO that lasted for 1000yrs but if nobody knew about it then you will not have many invest regardless of your project.
LISK - has made far greater effort to advertise their ICO ...can you go a page on this board without seeing the huge LISK sigs everywhere?
Facebook rewards, twitter rewards. I'm not here to compare to LISK but since you want to discuss it I shall not stand in your path.
If I was coming from NXT i would have made certain my next ICO did not suffer the same fate.
Just think the iota community should think it over. If there was a poll that demonstrated such demand surely cgb and iota will reconsider? It's not even launched yet. You could lock in 100% profits by making the next IOTA 2x the price? how about that. Surely 100% profits is enough guaranteed?
Then so many more people rather than a handful in this community and no questioning of distribution and more funds for the project? seems no reason not to does there?
Why not all give it some time to sink in then think it over. I have to go now but you guys seem great so will certainly be back to discuss again in the near future. I only think a small minority would dislike the idea. Those that just want to try and dump out at 30x ico and not see such a promising project reach full potential without a black mark.