Unfortunately for you, the argument that was made, by me, was precisely and accurately stated as to being referential to one data set. The blind arrogance in ignoring that claim and it's statistical verification was ignored by the Warmers resident here whom then I can only call Deniers on the basis of their actions.
Frankly I don't know that 0.18F rise in 18 years rises to the point of statistical significance, but you are welcome to show that it does.
Your several other disjointed arguments thrown out are unrelated to the actual claim made.
Unless you would like to misrepresent the claim made and then proceed with a strawman argument?
lol...
Yeah like the fact that you and your colleagues widely ignored every single logical argument made here.
I've posted something like 4 articles explaining the consequences and the origine of climate change.
You didn't even replied to it. You simply ignored them and post other false informations.
Your only sources are poor blogs that totally and willingly misinterpret the scientific reports.