...
I have some questions about your "precisely and accurately stated" argument that was based on one data set

You claim a single data set as to be decisive proof?
Why do you think such a single data set to be decisive enough to be unequivocally accepted as proof of non-warming?

Now that particular data set has been shown to be incorrect and has been adjusted. Is your "precisely and accurately stated" argument still relevant?



Whether or not "0.18F rise in 18 years rises to the point of statistical significance" is important is probably less relevant than the justification for your argument is no longer useful....