btw .. The only thing I know about this project is that it is Ethereum with a twist (javascript instead of solidity).
I hope the devs do understand that that would not really be enough .... ..
Ethereum can easily add a javascript compiler into the bytecode
From a previous post a few pages back
LISK HOLDS THE FOLLOWING ADVANTAGES OVER ETHERIUM:Javascript language simplicity vs Solidity language complexity
Like I said ... easy to write a Javascript compiler to Ethereum bytecode 100,000+ JavaScript programmers vs. few Solidity programmers
The above argument eliminates this so called advantage of liskSingle hash generated vs. trillions of valid but discarded hashes generated to secure blockchain in one blocktime
Makes no sense at allCooperative, efficient blockchain generation vs. competitive, wasteful blockchain generation
looks like the same as aboveStable roundtable clockwork forging vs. unsustainable, exponentially growing free-for-all mining
Forging is no different than mining ... just different ways to make the currencyDapps on individual sidechains vs. dapps on bloated mainchain
Ethereum dapps are also sidechains .. lol .. you seem to be uninformedMin of 2-4 to max of 101 cheap $35 Pi2 / $9 CHIP microcomputers needed for each sidechain backbone vs. large, unlimited numbers of expensive GPU systems needed for mainchain backbone
The GPU rings will not be used once POS for eth sets inSidechain dapps permanently free vs. mainchain perpetual "gas" payments required
Ah ... What can possibly be the use of the beloved LISK then ... It's why I asked the guys what direction they going to take the current Crypti VM in order to be able to compete. Solidity pretty much eliminated the only advantage Crypti had over Eth.
As mentioned, Crypti needs other advantages over Eth to be interesting for developers.