your assumption that quadric wont be solved in april.
True enough, I did assume the same software running on both rasPi2 and 3 (which you did too to get to your 2660 number, so I guess that was fair, no?).
Do we want to then make an effort to recalculate the rest using my 2309 number and ignore the question about linear scaling with GHz?
we are currently throwing random scenario numbers around.
my assumption was rasp2 using old software where quadratics was an issue compared to april rasp3 where it wasnt an issue
making not only a ghz performance increase (ill yield to your 2309) but then a multiple gain due to the code efficiency increase
what would be best is to use real bitcoin data as the ultimate goal rather then random scenario speculation