I have asked many people how the trust system works and they all either don't respond at all
or say they are not sure
lets have a look at your feedback shall we
((((( Involved in a Skrill account hack / scam. Details in reference. )))))
is there anyone
even ONE person who can honestly say that when seeing that from a "default" level member they would not assume it means that I am a hacking scammer ?
involved in a skrill account Hack
Lie - I was never in any way involved with that account
Lie - I was NOT involved in the hack (if there even really was one)
Lie - I was not involved in the scam
IF the account was hacked I had no part in it
and though there clearly was a scam here somewhere I had no part in the scam
you are saying I am involved cause I setup the trade
under that logic I could blame the other people in this thread for your abusive feedback on me
but I do not
they are not involved in that you did it alone
you didn't prevaricate at all
you said "involved in Hack/scam"
that is not even an accusation it's a statement of fact
but it is not a fact it is a lie
I had no part in any plan to defraud anyone
So you admit that you don't understand how the trust system works but that doesn't prevent you from labeling my feedback as "abusive". Same self-serving bias that got you into trouble to begin with.
I have revised my trust comment to clarify the "involvement". Enjoy.