Overall, we are repeating ourselves, and I am genuinely not interested in debating the matter of blocksize limits.
I already stated my position much more than I feel is necessary in relation to bitcoin prices and wall speculation.. blah blah blah. In essence, I said that I am not convinced that there is a problem as you keep arguing that there is some kind of problem. In that regard, what's the point of going over and over and over the same points, and mostly speculation that there may be a problem later?
I am involved in this thread in order to discuss price matters, and wall matters, and predictions, and to look at stupid animated gifs and that kind of stuff.
I think that there are sufficient plans in place in order to address blocksize limits in the near future that are likely going to be worked out and are evolving.. including seg wit and that is good enough for me in order to continue to invest in bitcoin and consider bitcoin with a rosey and bright future.. inspite of ongoing forking whiners.
Ok, I accept you're not interested in debating the matter of blocksize limits. It's not for everybody. But if you publicly state opinions, I feel free to respond to them, since it also allows others here to make up their mind.
As long as the capacity problem (that I see coming, and you don't) exists, it's worth doing so for me. I'm invested in Bitcoin, and I don't want to see it fail. You may see that as whining, as I advocate a hard fork to raise the block size limit asap in order to buy us time to properly implement those plans you are referring to.
I'll keep whining until I sell my BTC.
Of course, you have a right to post in response to whatever you like, and you certainly have plenty of companions in this same thread, in many other forum threads and in redit/bitcoin whining, exaggerating and spreading the same kinds of misinformation about the same topic.
In my thinking it rises to the level of whining because it appears to be deceptive in a variety of ways.
Many of you goofballs engage in all kinds of fancy dancing in order to describe various scares about technical issues that don't really exist because when push comes to shove, you are not really concerned about technical issues (at least those who really understand the matter) but instead just want to whine, whine and whine and you want to insist on a hardfork or some other governance matter, which is really about disrupting while at the same time blaming the other side rather than attempts at resolution of potential technicalities in a reasonable and responsible manner.
Possibly, half of you are paid shills, another 1/3 are misinformed or super emotional. If these supposed technical matters had been presented continuously, argued and evidence set forth as a technical issue, then possibly there may have been some attempt at resolution, but based on the much illogical insistence on hard forks and other blackmailing attempts, i get the sense that technicalities continue to be exaggerated, which seems to be the case whenever looking into any details or evidence in support of technical block limit problem matters.
Furthermore, the next move after seeing multiple flaws in the overall technical arguments, trolls like you tend to want to drag the topic into the weeds in order to distract and divert, when in the end all you seem to want is a hardfork (which gets us back to governance rather than real and concrete technical matters regarding possible problems with the current blocksize limits).