...
However, a lot of the 911 conspiracy assertions are so stupid it's fucking ridiculous. So let's get those out of the way. Just think of me as a guy who WILL ANSWER, and provide the math, for chemistry and physics issues related to 911. That's it. No more. Although there is interplay - if your favorite 911 conspiracy theory requires wrong physics or wrong chemistry to logically require the US government to be the bad guy, prepare to be proven a fool.
I agree. A lot of assertions about a lot of things are in this category. Especially about contentious things. After studying the phenomenon for a while now, I believe that to some degree a lot of this is by design. It's known as 'cognitive dissonance.' They say that Cass Sunstein suggests it as a means of disrupting 'false conspiracies.'
Did you read the
Harrit et-al paper? I've not run across any scientifically compelling challenges to the material, though I've not looked for a while.
I've also not run across a good explanation about why so many people would compromise their careers and reputations to perpetuate a challenge to the official narrative of 9/11 just for shits and giggles.
http://www.ae911truth.org/Are we through with the "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" argument or is there more on that subject.
The Architects and Engineers dudes cover much of this material and rather convincingly as I see it.