One question to you guys. If we now have your system and a group with 20% of all LISK. These guys can now split the 20% LISK between 20 accounts and vote 20 delegates into the top 101, which will stay there forever.
Where is my thinking error? The current system would be much better, because it could prevent it. Your system couldn't do anything.
Yes you are right, but the cost would be 20% of Lisk to grab 20 spots, instead of 1% to grab 20 spots
Please see my post above. It seems you don't understand our current system. With 1% you will never grab any seat at Lisk. Not if you are on your own and alone to vote for yourself.
I hope I am, I will read the docs again. My numbers might be off, but I think I am not off on the concept. Never the less, please do not take this as FUD, as I am heavily invested and am interested in grabing a delegate spot, hence why I am concerned that the delegate system might be taken "advantage off".
Thanks for answering my questions.
There you see that even though we own over 62% of all Crypti you will still need about 10M XCR to get control over the Crypti network.