Gravity points down. That's where things fall. Down. And saying "the fires didn't weaken" does not make it true. It doesn't even make an argument. It's more like random words.
Finally, there are huge differences between 7 and the towers. For example, the primary support for the towers were the beams around the outside. The primary support for the bldg 7 was far to the interior. Again, just saying something isn't even an argument.
Does that make sense?
Hey, I didn't know about building 7 but the picture above are rather... Evidences.
Seems like some buildings went down without anything hitting them no?
According to conspiracy theorists, "Something hitting them" DOESN'T bring them down. It takes additional hundreds of ninja type guys secreting explosives in the dead of night.
Why that kind of thinking would be required when simple fires would do it, I don't know.
Because all burning buildings that burn for merely hours collapse in a free fall manor, correct?


Not to mention buildings that burned for DAYS, and still never collapsed...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4263667.stmI'm glad someone else does your thinking for you... Makes it easy right? lmfao...
Nonsense. The Pentagon is not your average building.
Ah yes, the old vaporize an entire plane on impact, but keep the dna samples intact kind of building? lol