Re: What if classic coup is just a large-scale manipulation by altcoin pumper gang?
I didn't notice you using statistics, logic or real data to attack Lightning,
really??
i have never used statistics
using blockstreams doomsday story of comparing bitcoin to possible Visa..(dont worry i hate it too, but relax, think of it from the end-user usage not the who controls it mindset)
visa averages each customer does 40 transactions a year.
bitcoin currently has 2.5mill users and based on the maths of ACTUAL average transactions per block(2000tx=500byte/tx)
2000tx(block)*144(day)*365(year)=105mill .. which not surprisingly also corresponds to a 40tx/user per year.. (kinda funny that)
[...]
Well, that just about qualifies as statistics, where are you getting these numbers from though? You expect people to actually take statements like "bitcoin currently has 2.5mill users" at your word? Remember, this is your word we're talking about here
never used logic?
how about the basic logic that blockstream want the imaginary 900million people to stay on just a dozen insecure central hubs, yet spout out how its better than just using visa or more secure then bitcoin.
how about the logic that there wont be 900million users in the next few years.
how about the logic that people can livestream their gaming, while also in group chat while also playing said online game. all of which is high upload bandwidth.
how about the logic of a traditional bitcoin transaction vs a segwit confidential payment transaction.. real byte for byte.
oh and by the way the math to work that out was from you blockstreamers. so it made me laugh when it actually does against everything you say.
EG 2mb maxblocksize = upto 4000 transactions for 2mb data storage.
1mb maxblocksize PLUS segwit and confidential payment codes = upto 3800 transactions for 2.85mb data storage.
so if segwit and confidential payment codes are not a network bandwidth or hard drive store, or node distribution problem. then 2mb maxblocksize isnt either.
bitcoin can work on a raspberry Pi.. meaning even a 2005 (11 year old) computer is atleast 2 times more powerful. and so a 5 year old computer or a 6 month old computer can handle alot more.
how about the basic logic that blockstream want the imaginary 900million people to stay on just a dozen insecure central hubs, yet spout out how its better than just using visa or more secure then bitcoin.
how about the logic that there wont be 900million users in the next few years.
how about the logic that people can livestream their gaming, while also in group chat while also playing said online game. all of which is high upload bandwidth.
how about the logic of a traditional bitcoin transaction vs a segwit confidential payment transaction.. real byte for byte.
oh and by the way the math to work that out was from you blockstreamers. so it made me laugh when it actually does against everything you say.
EG 2mb maxblocksize = upto 4000 transactions for 2mb data storage.
1mb maxblocksize PLUS segwit and confidential payment codes = upto 3800 transactions for 2.85mb data storage.
so if segwit and confidential payment codes are not a network bandwidth or hard drive store, or node distribution problem. then 2mb maxblocksize isnt either.
Right, so as usual, all the developers are wrong and your working is correct (let's be honest, why would anyone bother to check your working?). Why aren't you and your ideas about Bitcoin being taken seriously, Franky?