Few questions:

• What makes B&C better than OpenLedger?
• What are the differences between BKS shareholders and signers in terms of voting power?
• How are you planning to take into consideration and defend the B&C user interests Vs BKS shareholders & signers?  

I see your voting system a bit too static and away from what decentralization means...You are giving zero power to your users which are the most important part of your project. You might have achieved a decentralized platform but its governance model defeats the whole idea that your are trying to sell. Why don't you make it a decentralized autonomous exchange (DAE) far from human conflict of interest. The running costs including developers would come out of the fees and donations and if there was a surplus the whole community could vote what to do with it via a smart voting system that takes into account the users voice, the developers voice and the infrastructure people voice. Perhaps this is the next thing after "Decentralized" exchanges...

Cheers