The purpose of this thread is to warn others about a small portion of dooglus's prior transgressions.
Noted.
I do believe that dooglus should be removed from DT.
Is this in your personal interest(for whatever reason) or in the communitys interest, or maybe both?
Although not for reasons listed in the OP (this will come later in my series).
I would like to see the full picture before giving a statement about it, anyways this is above my level of influence.
If you believe that someone who engaged in this kind of activity should be given negative trust and/or excluded from your trust list then I would
suggest doing so.
Yes i do. But as stated before, it doesnt work for things way back in the past. I made that timeframe limit after doing the coin-gnt feedbacks. It works like this: Posting a warining (PSA) that all future support will result in a negative feedback. Tag people who go on. The definition of support is: Promoting and advertising, this includes posting about investments, taking part in promotions. (Thats just how i personally handle it)
I am not sure if having code on your own repo is support. I also have forks of code in my repo that i dont support. I do so to be sure there is a copy of the code for future reference.
I would note that you did leave a negative rating for BSM for selling a ponzi script, and dooglus has one listed for free on his github account, so I think it would probably only be logical for you to leave him a negative trust rating.
BSM was advertising it and his intention was to sell it, it was not public available. In addition he told people first he would stop doing so but started to sell it again short after feedbacks were removed.
I understand the argument but i dont see doogs personal benefit of having the source in his repo. Yes, i am aware he did changes to it.