3. Posting of your participation in any form in their threads is UNDENIABLE PROOF that you don't give a shit about other users being ripped off.
Posting about it is worthy of a negative rating but hosting the source code is ok to do.
Logic fail.
He did not 'post about it' in the thread, he merely confirmed he had fixed some bugs and stated that the code was shit and shouldn't be used on a live system. That is not 'posting of your participation' in the ponzi.
Curious, if I went and posted a thread with this same exact ponzi script linking to his github for download how long would it take before you would give me a negative rating?
I don't know, depends on whether I'm about at my desk when you do.
If you posted a link encouraging people to download it so they could run their own ponzi schemes, it would warrant tagging you. If you posted a link discussing the shonky code inside it, that is something else.
Next.
Using my nifty Googling skills there is all sorts of info pertaining to the code that Dooglus fixed being used massively to scam people.
You are just showing how two faced you are. It isn't ok for new people to have anything to do with ponzis but its ok for DT users to host it as a repo on their github while it is actively being used to scam people with.
It's ok though, blocking you from my trust list as you can no longer be trusted to do what is right.
Next.