Re: Gun freedom advocates - what weapons shouldn't be legally available?
Quote
You haven't mentioned any limits on the type of antipersonnel technology a citizen should be allowed to access, the topic of the OP. Do you think there should be any? If so, what?Hand guns ok, automatic weapons not ok? Knives ok, swords not ok?
Nope, I don't think there should be any limits, not when it comes to government law anyway, it should be down to the discretion of the seller whether or not they think it's a good idea to sell to certain people or not.
Why would a seller not want to sell? Especially if he or she doesn't live locally.
It will depend on the community, but you can be pretty sure that sellers etc. in the community would take it pretty personally if they're friends got threatened with guns that they sold
, the problem with taking the position of a government loyalist is that these people don't seem to realise that most don't want to fight or have violence happening around them constantly, the idea that violence happens purely because of guns is just daft by itself too, particularly when I can get my hands on all sorts of explosives and chemical weaponry at your average hardware store.
No positions are being taken. I have no loyalty to the US Government, or any particular government party of any particular country.You don't have to have a government in order to live peacefully, in fact, most people do it regardless of the police walking around their neighbourhoods.
Source? When you say "most" do you mean "most people" or "most people I know"?
