Regarding Evan, remember that:
The list is reserved for those who were instrumental in substantially ripping off folks in the cryptocurrency space.
1. Is there anyone who can claim he has been ...ripped off by Evan, directly or indirectly, due to the ...instamine? Not to mention the mathematical impossibility of it (first coins coins were at 0.000025 btc, now it's floating around 0.017-0.018 btc - so it's impossible to have lost money due to the instamine). The biggest scams (or hacks) affecting darkcoin (now dash) were
all exchange-related. Ccex, mintpal, cryptsy - in that order.
2. Regarding supply reduction: Initial specs were for 84mn coins. When the diff formula was applied to reduce reward with increase in hashing, the theoretical max went down to ~10mn. Then Evan changed it back to 84mn to account for the problem with the new formula with users "bitching" they preferred the 10mn:
2a) User "bitching" for the 10mn to 84mn increase:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5455971#msg54559712b) Evan explaining why it was set back to 84mn (that was not a fixed number - it would be variable, depending the hash difficulty - meaning it could go over 100mn) instead of 10mn:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5457829#msg54578292c) A few days later, a poll was done to settle the supply issue in terms of a high or a low limit (otherwise it would still be at 84mn or more). It was settled by the users in favor of a lower limit:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=525093.03. Regarding initial distribution and fixing it. Evan proposed an airdrop to that effect. He was flamed and attacked by members of the community for even thinking and proposing such a thing, with rage quits etc etc. The poll result is here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=559932.0 (rejecting Evan's airdrop fix proposal)